9911796707
TMI Blog2006 (12) TMI 423X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t of penalty. 2. Alter examining the records and hearing both sides, we find that the demand of duty is purely based on statements. Some of the statements were recorded from buyers/brokers. Two statements were recorded from the Managing Director of the appellant-Company, one on 16-11-1998 and the other on 24-12-1998. The Managing Director's statements were confessional in nature as regards the suspicion of the department that cotton yarn had been clandestinely removed during the above period. It is claimed by the appellants that these statements were retracted the very next day through not a rised affidavits which were sent to the departmental authorities under Certificate of Posting. In the circumstances, according to the ld. Counsel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Director's statements dated 16-11-1998 and 24-12-98 should have been considered to have been duly retracted. Thus ld. Counsel claims prima facie case against the demand of duty and penult. Ld. SDR opposes this claim and reiterates the findings recorded by the authorities. 3. After giving careful consideration to the submissions, we note that there was no seizure of goods from the premises of any buyer or broker; no discrepancy was found between the stock of goods in the appellants' factory vis-a-vis RG 1 record. As noted by the Joint Commissioner in his order, demand of duty is purely based on statements of buyers/brokers. After considering the circumstances in which such statements were recorded, we are inclined to doubt the reliabil ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... onus of rebuttal of presumption is cast on the department in terms of the Hon'ble High Court's judgment. In the absence of the requisite pleading of dates of receipt of affidavits by the department, we are not in a position to apply the cited case law to the facts of the instant case. Hence, for the present purpose, we have to take the prima facie view that the confessional statements of the Managing Director were not duly retracted and, accordingly, we shall direct the appellants to make pre-deposit of a reasonable amount of duty. 4. The appellants are directed to pre-deposit Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh) within four weeks and report compliance on 22nd January, 2007. In the event of due compliance, there will be waiver of pre-dep ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
