2007 (10) TMI 474

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 106/17/95/CEX dated 2-3-95.
Ms. Archana Wadhwa, J. REPRESENTED BY : Shri S. Gautam, SDR, for the Appellant. None, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The brief facts of the case in the present appeal of the Revenue are as under :- 2. The assessee had cleared S.S. Flats without payment of duty in terms of Notification No. 43/2001-C.E. (N.T.) dated 26-6-01 to M/s. Rama Sheets Pvt. Ltd., Jod .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 001. The demand was accordingly confirmed by the original adjudicating authority. The Commissioner (Appeals), however, set aside the order of lower authority and allowed the appeal. Hence the present appeal. 4. The Commissioner (Appeals) has allowed the appeal by observing as under :- "I have gone through the case records and submissions of the appellant, I find that the following facts are .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... body builders there is no reason to deny it to the manufacturer of the other commodities as provided under the Board's Circular dated 29-11-2001. Therefore, I find lot of force in the appellants submission and accordingly the impugned Order-in-Original is set aside. The appeal is allowed." 5. The Revenue in their appeal memo has again reiterated that proper procedure was not followed. Howe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X