2008 (5) TMI 493

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pondent. [Order per : Justice S.N. Jha, President]. - Heard the parties on the point of waiver/stay. 2. The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) at the relevant time, was engaged in the manufacture and export of Boneless Buffalo Meat Meal . It paid excise duty up to 3-1-2002 under sub-heading no. 0501.00 of Chapter 5 of the Central Excise Tariff, 1985. Even when duty was being p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n, the Tribunal observed as under : It is submitted by the Revenue that the rate of duty under the tariff heading under which Revenue wants to classify the goods and the classification claimed by respondents is the same. 3. The case of the appellant is that by reason of the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 24-6-2003 (supra) with which the Tribunal did not interfere, the dispute as t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Commissioner (Appeals) or the Tribunal cannot be read in the manner as suggested on behalf of the appellant. Learned counsel placed reliance on Notification No. 23/2003-C.E., dated 31-3-2003 under which exemption was granted to Bone Meat Meal falling under any Chapter of the Tariff in excess of nil rate of duty subject to fulfilment of certain conditions as mentioned in the Notification. There .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X