2007 (8) TMI 604

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Respondent. [Order per : M. Veeraiyan, Member (T)]. This is appeal against the order of the commissioner (Appeals) No. YPP/196/SRT/2003/690 date 31-1-2003 2. Heard both sides. 3. The relevant facts, in brief, are as follows : - (a) The appellant was working under compounded levy scheme w.e.f. 16-12-1998. (b) They were having two stenter machines and one stenter mac .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y has confirmed the demand on the ground that the stenter has been dismantled without prior permission of the Commissioner and the same has been upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals). 4. We have carefully considered the submissions from both sides. There is no allegation that the stenter was being operated during the period for which demand has been raised. It is also not disputed that the stente .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X