2008 (11) TMI 445

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ant. Shri J.C. Patel, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. Being aggrieved with the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Revenue has preferred the present appeal. 2. We heard both the sides. Revenue is represented by Ms. M.I.J. Micheal, ld. Jt. CDR and Shri J.C. Patel appearing for the respondents. As per facts on record, appellant has impo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ent will be valid for cases except as respect of things done or committed to be done before such amendments. Inasmuch as import and clearance of goods was much before 12-4-2002, he held that the amendment imposing safeguard duty will not be applicable. 3. We find no infirmity in above view of Commissioner (Appeals). Even as an ordinary interpretation of law, any fresh levy is applicable from the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X