2008 (4) TMI 639

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... REPRESENTED BY : Shri Willingdon Christian, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri M.M. Mathkar, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. All the four appeals, two filed under Excise Act and two under Customs Act, are being disposed by a common order as they arise out of the same impugned order. 2. After hearing both sides, duly represented by Shri Willingdon C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssed confirming the demand as proposed and imposing penalty to the extent of 100%. Subject order is impugned before us. 3. Learned advocate submits that he is not challenging confirmation of Central Excise duty in respect of short found final product, but submits that in as much as the same was deposited before issuance of show cause notice, penalty amount be reduced to 25% of the duty amount, i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... E.L.T. 506 (T)] in case of M/s. Angana Textiles P. Ltd. (iii) CESTAT Order No. A/460-461/WZB/AHD/2008, dt. 4-3-08 in case of M/s. Indian Polyfins Ltd. and M/s. Prime Furnishing Pvt. Ltd., Surat (iv) CESTAT Order No. A/429-430/WZB/AHD/2007 dt. 8-6-07 in case of M/s. Amitex Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd., Surat. 5. By following the ratio of the law as declared in the above referred decisions, we se .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X