2008 (6) TMI 530

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... mber (T)]. This appeal has been filed against Order-in-Original No. 14/2004 RP de novo dated 15-10-2004 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Visakhapatnam. 2. Shri Rajiv Waglay, learned Advocate, appeared on behalf of the appellant and Shri S.G. Dewalwar, the learned SDR on behalf of the Revenue. 3. We heard both sides. 4. In the impugned order, the Adjudicating Authority has .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ot imposed with any penalty. However, M/s. Interscape again approached this Tribunal and this Tribunal remanded the matter to the Original Authority second time. Even though, the present appellant was not a party to the second adjudication order, notice was issued to him by the Commissioner and appellant was asked to be present for the adjudication proceedings and on conclusion of the adjudication .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X