TMI Blog2008 (12) TMI 542X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... S/Shri K.S. Ravi Shankar and N. Anand, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri V.P.C. Rao, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T) (Oral)]. - In terms of the impugned order, the appellants are required to pre-deposit the following amounts :- (i) Duty of Rs. 29,39,664/- and equal amount of penalty under Section 11AC (ii) Penalty of Rs. 1,00,000/- each on the following Dir ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cided by the Tribunal in the case of Decorative Laminates (India) (P) Ltd. v. CCE - 1990 (46) E.L.T. 506 (Tribunal). In the said case, it was held that commercial ply wood coated with duty paid phenol formaldehyde resin is classifiable under CH 4408.90 as 'Articles of wood'. The said decision has been upheld by the Supreme Court as reported in 1997 (89) E.L.T. A40 (S.C.). The learned Advocate furt ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|