2009 (6) TMI 725

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , for the Appellant. Shri S.K. Mall, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - The appellants are absent. We have, accordingly, heard the learned SDR and gone through the impugned order. 2. The dispute relates to the correct classification of Taspa yarn being manufactured by the appellant. Whereas the appellants have claimed classification of the same under Hea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f M/s. Garden Silk Mills [1995 (78) E.L.T. 580 (T.)], which was subsequently set aside and remanded by Hon'ble Supreme Court. As such, during the relevant time, there was lot of confusion as regards correct classification of Taspa yarn and the appellants cannot, prima facie, be held guilty of suppression or mala fide so as to invoke longer period of limitation. Accordingly, we are of the view that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X