2009 (4) TMI 678

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri K.K. Goel, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice R.M.S. Khandeparkar, President]. Heard. 2. The matter has come up for hearing pursuant to the order passed by the Hon ble Delhi High Court in Writ Petition No. 7227 of 2009 on 5-3-2009. 3. Learned Advocate appearing for the appellant has mainly canvassed the point regarding bar of limitation for issuance of the show caus .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o the appellant is from June 2002 to March 2005. He further submitted that besides the said disclosure to the Department, there were two show cause notices issued in relation to the similar subject matter. The matter went to the Hon ble High Court with decision in favour of the company. Therefore, there was no suppression of facts which have been alleged against the appellant in order to invoke th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... h was revealed to the Department by the appellant pertaining to sharing of the advertisement expenditure by the appellant and their dealers. The letter dated 11th September 2003 alongwith annexures disclosed the information having been given about expenses in relation to the advertisement of the appellants products. The impugned order does not show any reference thereto. Mere observation that the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X