9911796707
TMI Blog1960 (1) TMI 19X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Revision Application No. 93 of 1958 and dismissed the said application. Two points were taken in the application, as will appear from the judgment. It was contended that a reasonable opportunity was not given to the applicant by the Assistant Collector of Sales Tax when a proceeding was pending before him. That contention was disposed of by the Tribunal which observed that the applicant had made s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... le to say that there was any denial of opportunity to the pleader for the applicant. Moreover, the Assistant Collector was sufficiently indulgent in giving every possible opportunity to the applicant since an adjournment was given to the applicant from time to time and it can never be urged that no reasonable opportunity was given to the applicant to produce his evidence. Another point was made be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pparent after an elaborate argument is, we think, no mistake which can be said to be one apparent from the record. To make a mistake apparent from the record must, therefore, be a mistake which is so plain that he who runs may read. Evidently, only two points were urged before the Tribunal and no exception is taken to the way in which those two points have been disposed of by this Tribunal. Can it ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... his case. It would be reasonable to say that the applicant did not take advantage of the facilities offered to the applicant. It is now too late in the day to contend that a mistake has occurred which requires to be rectified. 5.. We have heard Mr. Ghael upon this application and apart from the two submissions which were made by the applicant's pleader before the Tribunal at the previous hearing, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
