9911796707
TMI Blog1971 (7) TMI 151X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on interdicting the respondent from proceeding further in pursuance of the Notice G.I. No. 2717/69-70/2 dated 23rd October, 1969. The petitioner M/s. Brugumalla Venkatappaiah Son & Co., who are dealers in copra have submitted returns of the turnover for the months of April, May, June, July and August, 1969. In those returns, according to the respondent, certain turnovers which ought to have been ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... further notice. Section 32 of the Act reads as follows: "The prescribed authority may accept from any person who has committed or is reasonably suspected of having committed an offence under this Act, by way of composition of such offence- (a) where the offence consists of the failure to pay, or the evasion of, any tax recoverable under this Act, in addition to the tax so recoverable, a sum of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ot contemplate an offer to proceed from the prescribed authority for composition of an offence. That apart, the composition of an offence could be with reference to a person who has committed or is reasonably suspected of having committed an offence under the Act. The allegation of the respondent as per the Notice G.I. No. 2717/69-70/1 dated 23rd October, 1969, is that the petitioner, who is the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... uspicion that the petitioner has committed an offence, which he may or may not agree to be compounded in accordance with section 32 of the Act. Until an enquiry, pursuant to the Notice G. I. No. 2717/69-70/1 is completed, in my opinion, the Commercial Tax Officer cannot entertain a reasonable suspicion that the petitioner has committed an offence. Hence the question of asking him to choose either ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
