9911796707
TMI Blog1972 (9) TMI 132X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to as the Act): "Whether the liability to pay tax under section 4 of the Orissa Sales Tax Act accrues on the date of the application for obtaining the certificate of registration, or from the date when the certificate of registration is granted?" The facts giving rise to the dispute are these: The assessee commenced business in January, 1959, and applied for registration under section 9-A of t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... assessee had no liability for payment of sales tax until the date of grant of registration certificate on 10th June, 1960. Thereupon the taxing department applied for a reference to this court under section 24(1) of the Act. When the Additional Tribunal rejected this prayer, this court was moved as already indicated. Liability for taxation is provided under section 4 of the Act and under sub-sec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -A of the Act. Whether a dealer gets registered or not, if liability under section 4 comes upon him he has got to pay tax under the Act. This position has been settled beyond doubt by the Supreme Court in Central Potteries Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra[1962] 13 S.T.C. 472 (S.C.). Venkatarama Aiyar, J., delivering the judgment of the court analysed the corresponding provisions of the Central Provinc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rred by section 11(1) but the Act does not put him in a better position than a dealer who has got himself registered under section 8(1) and absolve him from his liability to pay tax under section 4." The assessee has not been disputing any longer that the determination of liability under section 4 from 1st April, 1960, is bad. Once that liability has accrued, the obligation to pay tax under the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
