9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (9) TMI 772X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gth the learned advocate for the applicant and learned DR. This is an application for recall of the order dated 20-4-09 passed in Rectification Application No. 55/2008 in C.E. [2009 (238) E.L.T. 466 (Tri. - Del.)] Appeal No. 3040/04 and for restoration of said Rectification Application No. 55/08 for hearing on merits. 2. It is the case of the applicant that normally rectification application are ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s further case that there was no attempt on the part of the applicant to delay the proceedings and he is certainly interested in pursuing with the matter. The learned advocate for the applicant while arguing the matter submitted that he was under the impression that the matter was adjourned to 24-4-09 from 6-3-09 as 24-4-09 happened to be Friday and earlier the rectification applications were list ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e on behalf of the applicant was rejected and the rectification application No. 55/08 was dismissed. It is true that order discloses the date of 20-4-09, which was obviously a typing mistake. We have perused the cause list of 22-4-09 and it clearly shows that the Rectification Application No. 55/08 was listed for hearing on 22-4-09 and not on 20-4-09. While dismissing the application on 22-4-09 it ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... account of non-availability of the advocate that the matter was dismissed. 5. It has been the consistent view of the Courts and Tribunals that any failure on the part of the advocate, the party should not be made to suffer. Bearing the same in mind and in the interest of justice, we recall our order dated 22-4-09 and restore the rectification application No. 55/09 in Appeal No. E/3040/09. The s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
