1982 (12) TMI 181

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... assessee, quite naturally, is that they were all second sales. This has been accepted by the Tribunal in appeal. In this revision, the State Government questions that finding. It is on record that the goods which have been sold by the assessee in this case were all goods purchased from a concern by name "Honesty Electricals". This Honesty Electricals figured in two tax cases on a former occa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is accordingly dismissed. Appendix [The judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court consisting of BALASUBRAHMANYAN and RATNAM, JJ., in State of Tamil Nadu v. Devendra Electricals (T.C. No. 1078 of 1982 decided on October 7, 1982) is printed below: ] STATE OF TAMIL NADU v. DEVENDRA ELECTRICALS The judgment of the Court was delivered by BALASUBRAHMANYAN, J-The petitioner in th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... purchased the concerned goods. When the matter was taken in appeal before the Tribunal, the assessee cited the decision of this Court in Govindan Co. v. State of Tamil Nadu [1975] 35 STC 50 and contended that when it was established by evidence that Honesty Electricals had sold the goods to the assessee it was not necessary for the assessee to farther establish that that concern had also paid th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X