9911796707
TMI Blog1989 (11) TMI 293X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rd of Revenue has submitted the statement of the case and sought opinion of this Court on the following question: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in stating that the forms appended to the Notification No. 966-655-V-ST dated March 28, 1969, can be produced at any time even though section 39-A bars the acceptance of additional evidence at app ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r of Sales Tax, Bilaspur. It was stated that he had supplied a lot of material to the Government Departments after October 1, 1978 and, accordingly, he was entitled for set-off under section 8(1) of the Act. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner rejected his contention saying that the necessary certificates from the Government Departments were not appended in the case. A copy of the appellate order of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is as to whether the Government Notification No. 966-655-V-ST dated March 28, 1969, is such a piece of additional evidence as is barred to be produced at any subsequent stage under the provisions of section 39-A of the Act. In the first place, we must emphasise that a notification published in the Official Gazette is not a factual piece of evidence but is a part of law which has to be considered b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ing the force of law is not a piece of additional evidence. It is a law of which public notice must be taken of as being operative on the field to which it applies. The question of bar under section 39-A of the Act, therefore, does not arise and the Tribunal (Board) was perfectly justified in taking notice of the notification along with the forms appended to that notification, which, for all pract ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
