9911796707
TMI Blog2010 (8) TMI 278X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... p; Shri Hardik Modh, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Avinash Thete, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - After hearing both the sides we find that the Tribunal vide its order No. A/881-822/WZB/AHD/09 dated 23-4-09 dismissed the appeals for non-compliance with the provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act read with ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lant did not deposit the amount and challenged the High Court's order before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, by way of filing a special leave petition, the SLP was rejected by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its order dated 6-4-09 [2010 (255) E.L.T. A82 (S.C.)] with directions to deposit the amount in question within a period of two weeks from that date. 4. The appellant did not deposit the amount ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lled and restored for final disposal. 6. However we find no merits in the above contention of the learned advocate. The Tribunal's decision was challenged in appeal before the Hon'ble High Court as also before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the dispute attained finality by Supreme Court's order dated 6-4-09 [2010 (255) E.L.T. A82 (S.C.)], vide which the period to deposit is extended by two we ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
