2009 (12) TMI 575

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s confirmed by the Tribunal - Based on the Supreme Court in IPCA Laboratory v. Deputy CIT [2004 -TMI - 6141 - SUPREME Court] wherein the Supreme Court has clearly held that unless profit is derived by the exporters in respect of the export, the supporting manufacturer is not entitled to deduction based on the disclaimer certificate issued which in this case produced by the appellant shows that exp .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ne products to the exporters for export by them. In support of the assessee's claim for deduction, the assessee produced disclaimer certificate from the exporters in Form No. 10CCAB. Even though the Assessing Officer allowed the claim, the Com-missioner of Income-tax, on scrutiny of the assessment, noticed that the exporters have suffered loss in respect of the transaction and, therefore, the asse .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... order, which is rendered, following the decision of the Supreme Court. 4. The next question pertains to the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80-IA. We notice that the claim is not tenable because fish processing is not manufacture or production of an article as held by the Supreme Court in CIT v. Relish Foods [1999] 237 ITR 59. Therefore, no interference is warranted with the findin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X