9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (2) TMI 134X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n 80HHC - The matter is covered in favour of the revenue by orders of this Court, CIT v. M/s Victor Forgings and CIT v. F.C. Sondhi (2010 - TMI - 203399 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT), wherein after noticing the judgment of the Bombay High Court in CIT v. Kalpataru Colours & Chemicals (2010 - TMI - 76895 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT), the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision in accordan ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mstances of the case, the ITAT was right in law in not holding that profit on transfer of DEPB entitlement represents the entire amount inclusive of premium of sale of such DEPB? (iii) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ITAT was right in law in holding that the word "profit" referred to in Sections 28(iiid) and 28(iiie) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 means the difference betwee ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion of deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961? (vi) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ITAT has failed to appreciate that deduction u/s 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was rightly computed in accordance with amendment made by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2005 with retrospective effect from 01.04.1998?" 2. Learned counsel for the appellant states ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
