2010 (11) TMI 343

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f success in appeal nor the balance of convenience lies in favour of the petitioner and that it was not inclines to interfere with the adjudication order at the interim stage, while rejecting the application, we do not find any ground to interfere with the order so passed - if the Appellate Tribunal has considered all the aspects of the matter, while considering the stay application and exercised .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d to take place, be stopped. 3. Sri K.D. Nag has raised a preliminary objection saying that the writ petition against the order rejecting the stay application is not maintainable and this apart the Tribunal has given very cogent reason for rejecting the stay application, which does not require any interference by this Court. 4. Though lengthy arguments have been raised from both the sides that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the High Court will not interfere under Article 226, unless it is established that such an exercise has not been made on sound judicial principles and is against the facts or in violation of law. 7. Consequence of the auction of the goods are given in the Act itself and would not cause any loss and injury to the petitioners, as their rights have been protected. 8. With the aforesaid observatio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X