9911796707
TMI Blog2010 (9) TMI 683X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tead of doing justice, it will be derailing the law made by the Parliament. The petitioner has not made out any case for exercising the extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Under the said circumstances, the petitioner, having missed the bus in three successive forums, cannot consider the Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as the last forum - The Writ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... drawback amount along with interest. The Authority, by the impugned order dated 16-7-2007, rejected the case put forth by the petitioner and confirmed the demand of excess paid drawback amount along with interest. As against the said order, the petitioner moved the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals) with appeal No. C24/68/2008-TTN (Customs). The said appeal vas filed in terms of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents pointed out that even the Tribunal under Section 129-A(3) of the Act has power to entertain appeal filed only three months from the date on which the order sought to be appealed and, therefore, the Tribunal correctly rejected the case of the petitioner. The learned counsel also pointed out that the only other appropriate forum is the Central Gover ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... doned. 6. The learned counsel has also referred to a decision of the Division Bench of the Principal Seat of this Court in W.A. Nos. 1222 and 1223 of 2002, dated 10-6-2002. In that case also, the Division Bench, on its own, condoned the delay for the reasons weighed with them. 7. It is not clear as to how those orders are anyway helpful to the petitioner, especially when the relief was given i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
