9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (11) TMI 595X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... High Court’s Order before the Hon’ble Supreme Court - Supreme Court on 18-12-2008 ordered thus : “we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. However, the time for deposit is extended by eight weeks - Where the Hon’ble Supreme Court stipulated a period for deposit of an amount by the appellant, they ought to have complied wi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 8-08. They did not deposit the amount. On the other hand, they challenged our order in Writ Petition before the Hon'ble High Court. The Hon'ble High Court dismissed the petition after observing that there was no case for interference with our order under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, vide High Court's Order dated 20-11-2008 in Writ Petition No. 2376/08. The appellant challenged the Hig ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 14-9-2009. Obviously, we can't. Where the Hon'ble Supreme Court stipulated a period for deposit of an amount by the appellant, they ought to have complied with the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Where the appellant made the deposit belatedly, it was open to them to move the Hon'ble Supreme Court for condonation of the delay. Neither this Tribunal nor, in our view even the Hon'ble High Co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
