TMI Blog2011 (8) TMI 104X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r dt.21.2.2011 - Decided in favour of the revenue - E/272/2005 - - - Dated:- 5-8-2011 - Ms.JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, J. For Appellant: Ms.Indira Sisupal, JDR For Respondent: Shri S.Venkatachalam, Advocate In this case, a show-cause notice dt. 15.1.93 was issued to the assessees (manufacturers of sodium silicate) proposing recovery of Rs.4,36,678.56 on the ground that they had cleared ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2002 once again confirmed the demand, appropriated the amount already paid and imposed penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) vide Order-in-Appeal No.8-11/04 dt. 22.1.2004 allowed the appeal of the assessees with consequential relief. The assessees once again filed the claim for refund and refund was sanctioned vide order dt. 21.9.04 Rs.1,25,000/- was paid by cheque and the balance amount of Rs.3,11, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|