2011 (1) TMI 765

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n after noticing the judgment of the Bombay High Court in CIT v. Kalpataru Colours & Chemicals (2010 - TMI - 76895 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT), the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision in accordance with law. - 522 of 2010 - - - Dated:- 31-1-2011 - MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, JJ. Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the appellant. ADARSH KUMAR .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... from 01.4.1998? (ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble ITAT was justified in allowing deduction u/s 80 HHC in respect of entire DEPB amount by incorporating the same in the computation of business profit u/s 28 (iib)? 3. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the matter is covered in favour of the revenue by orders of this Court dated 16.8.2010 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X