2011 (3) TMI 793

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lowed - ST/907/2010 - ST/110/2011(PB) - Dated:- 14-3-2011 - S/Shri D.N. Panda, Mathew John, JJ. REPRESENTED BY : Shri Jatinder Mohan, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Fateh Singh, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : D.N. Panda, Member (J)]. Although this matter was fixed only for stay hearing, the learned Counsel states that if benefit under the Notification No. 7/2001-S.T. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ays that the Appellant is an individual videographer operating from his home. Therefore he was not liable to pay any service tax. The above notification was in force from 9-7-2001 to 16-6-2005. 4. The learned DR on the other hand, supports the order of the authority below. 5. Heard both sides. 6. Notification cited above has been looked into by us. Though the benefit of the notification was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X