TMI Blog2011 (11) TMI 154X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r. Ganesh Haavanur, SDR, for the revenue Per: P.G. Chacko In this appeal filed by the assessee the limited challenge is against a penalty of Rs. 15,000/- imposed on them under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. In adjudication of a show-cause notice, the original authority had confirmed demand of Rs. 4,39,440/- for the period from 01.10.2003 to 08.07.2004 against the assessee by denying ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e buyers. It is categorically stated that the appellant does not dispute duty liability. In the circumstances, the appellant prays for setting aside the penalty. 3. We have heard the learned SDR also who has argued in support of the penalty on the strength of the findings recorded by the original and appellate authorities. 4. After giving careful consideration to the submissions we are of the vi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|