2010 (3) TMI 814

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt. They have also stated that the petitioner has collected service tax amount on the gross value charged by them, but have remitted only part of it to the Exchequer. Hence, the Tribunal held that the petitioner should be directed to deposit the entire demanded - Held that:- petitioner be directed to deposit 50% of the disputed amount, writ petition is disposed of
Chitra Venkataraman, J. Ms. L .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ount of Rs. 31,04,785/- within a period of four weeks from the date of the order of the Tribunal and to report compliance within four weeks thereafter. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has come before this Court seeking writ of certiorari to quash the order of the Tribunal dated 3-3-2010 and directed, the first respondent to dispose of the appeal on merits without insisting on the pre-deposit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... at the demand itself is without authority of law. Learned counsel-submits that the order passed by the first respondent be set aside and the condition as regards pre-deposit the entire disputed amount be stayed, so that the appeal can be taken up and disposed of. 3. I have gone through the order of the first respondent and the claim of the petitioner as regards prima facie case. It is no dou .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X