9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (3) TMI 1089X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... re amount of penalty imposed upon all the appellants. - E/761, 767, 768, 771, 795-805/2010 - - - Dated:- 22-3-2011 - Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, Dr. P. Babu, JJ. Shri D.K. Trivedi, Advd. For Sr.No.1, Written Submission by Sr.No.2for the Assessee; Shri S.K. Mall, SDR for the Revenue. Per: Mrs. Archana Wadhwa: After hearing both sides, we find that the Commissioner (Appeals) has ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... irecting them to deposit part amount of penalty. 3. Arguing on the applications, the learned advocate on behalf of M/s Falcon Submersibles Pvt. Ltd, submitted that out of the total duty of Rs.42,03,981/- confirmed against them, they have already deposited an amount of Rs.20 lakhs during the course of investigation and further deposit of Rs.2,73,664/- and of Rs.38,245/- has been made. As such, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... without insisting on any further pre-deposit. 6. Further, the appeals of 4 transporters, which stand decided by Commissioner (Appeals) on merit, by the same impugned order, are also required to be remanded inasmuch as the same are inter-linked with the appeal of M/s Falcon Submersibles Pvt. Ltd. 7. As a result, all the appeals are remanded. The stay petitions also get disposed off. (Dict ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
