9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (3) TMI 1175X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n admitted fact that the Revenue has not challenged the earlier order passed by this Tribunal, therefore, the said order has attained finality. As per the Board's Circular No. 485/51/99-Cx dated 15.9.1999, the Board has given instruction that 'the Commissioner to decide first whether the processor was otherwise eligible for abatement or not. In case he is eligible and he had not paid the duty, the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... espondent Per : Ashok Jindal Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order. 2. This is a second round of litigation. In the earlier round, this Tribunal vide order No. C-III/211 212/02-WZB dated 21.11.2002 held that since the abatement as claimed by the applicant has not been decided, they should not be subjected to the demand of duty, penalty and interest and accordingly have ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... case, we find that the impugned order has been passed by the lower appellate authority as per the direction of this Tribunal in earlier proceedings. It is also an admitted fact that the Revenue has not challenged the earlier order passed by this Tribunal, therefore, the said order has attained finality. As per the Board's Circular No. 485/51/99-Cx dated 15.9.1999, the Board has given instruction t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
