2012 (5) TMI 84

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Appellant. P.K.R. Menon and Jose Joseph for the Respondent. JUDGMENT C.N. Ramachandran Nair, J. - Question raised is whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in denying exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act for violation of section 13(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act. We have heard counsel for the appellant and Standing Counsel for respondent. 2. Appellant, though c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... both sides, we do not find any justification to interfere with the finding of the Tribunal because as a matter of fact the Tribunal found that there is a violation of section 13(1)(d) inasmuch as Rs. 50,000/- belonging to the trust remained invested during the previous year in a private finance company. Even though counsel for the appellant raised a contention that investment itself is not made i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X