9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (6) TMI 653X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rd to the fact that the Appellant is a charitable organisation which would face financial hardship by the order of deposit, goods were seized, the provisions of Section 129-E would mandate that the requirement of pre-deposit is not attracted. The Appellant has already deposited the amount of penalty imposed, Appeal allowed by dispensing with the requirement of pre-deposit under Section 129-E of th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pre-deposit an amount of ₹ 1,25,000/- towards the redemption fine and an amount of ₹ 5,00,000/- towards customs duty under Section 129E of the Act, having regard to financial condition of the Appellants? 2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents waives service. 3. By consent, the Appeal is taken up for hearing and final disposal. 4. The Appeal arises out of an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sit has directed the Appellant to deposit an amount of ₹ 5 lacs. 6. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant submitted that in the present case the goods were under the control of the Customs Authorities, as is evident from the show cause notice issued on 30 July 1999. Hence, it was submitted that on a plain reading of Section 129-E of the Customs Act, 1962, the requirement of pre- ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
