9911796707
TMI Blog2012 (12) TMI 668X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ring for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. It has been stated that the petitioner is working, as an Accounts Executive, in Infosys Technology Limited, Chennai, and he is an assesee on the files of the second respondent. The petitioner had filed the original return of income, for the assessment year 1999-2000, on 25.6.1999, and the return fil ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sited in the department account, on 24.12.1999. 4. It has been further stated that the demand raised by the Deputy Commissioner Income Tax, TDS, Bangalore, had been challenged before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) IV, Bangalore. The said appeal had been rejected by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), by an order, dated 12.9.2000. Thereafter, a further appeal had been filed by the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... espondent Department to refund the amounts deducted as tax, along with the interest accrued thereon. He had placed copies of such orders before this Court in support of his claims. One such order is, dated 1.4.2010, made in W.P.No.5860 of 2010. He had also placed reliance on the decision of a Division Bench of this Court, dated 23.12.2011, in a batch of cases, in W.A.Nos.1542 and 2161 of 2010 etc. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... amount of Rs.1,68,546/-, to the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, with regard to the claim of the petitioner, for the payment of interest accrued on the said amount, it would be open to the petitioner to make an appropriate application before the authority concerned. On such application being made, the authority concerned shall co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
