9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (3) TMI 232X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t taking any action - Held that:- CPIO has not withheld any information and has rightly held that it is beyond the jurisdiction and his duties to opine, comment or advice on matters under RTI Act or to take action against any authority or to direct any authority to take action. The Appellant is filing a number of RTI applications which do not seek any information as defined under Section 2(f) o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... can be fixed against the Govt officers for not taking any action till he (Mr. Mahesh. Kumar Bada) was alive, i.e, 4. years by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. (iii) Please inform what reassurance are taken by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. of India so that their orders are honored in the real spirit of the order by the Govt officers time. (iv) Please inform whether there is any check if Govt. does ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ngly disposed of File to be consigned." Further, a certified copy of' the above said order was forwarded to the concerned department on 18th July, 2000. No further information has been received from the concerned department after 10.07.2000. It is beyond the jurisdiction and scope of duties of the CPIO, Supreme Court of India under the Right To Information Act, 2005 to interpret the law, judgmen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng: The following were present Appellant : Mr. S. P. Goyal on video conference from NIC-Mumbai Studio; Respondent : Ms. Padmalakshmi Nigam, Advocate and Ms. Smita Vats Sharma, CPIO Additional Registrar; The Appellant is filing a number of RTI applications which do not seek any information as defined under Section 2(f) of the RTI Act. The Appellant must understand that information is someth ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
