2013 (3) TMI 426

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... wherein the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed input service credit availed by the respondents on the following services:-     a) CHA services     b) Port services     c) GTA services     d) Courier services and     e) Business Auxiliary Services 2. The facts of the case are that the respondents are manufactures of excis .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ated before the Commissioner (Appeals) who set aside the adjudication order and allowed the input service credit taken by the respondents. Aggrieved from the said order, Revenue is before me. 3. Shri Parmod Kumar, learned SDR appeared and submitted that as all the above services are availed by the respondents post-manufacturing and beyond the place of removal, therefore they are not entitled for .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... entitled for CENVAT credit availed by the respondents on the above cited services. To support his contention, he relied on the decisions of the Amalgamations Repco Ltd. & Others Vs CCE Chennai & Ors. and Commissioner Vs Ultratech Cement Ltd. - 2010 (20) STR 577 (Bom.). 5. Heard both sides. Considering the submissions made by both sides, I find that the decisions relied upon by the learned SDR are .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X