9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (4) TMI 614X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... MANU R6 BY ADV. SRI.S.K.PREMRAJ BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri. C.S. Manu, who entered appearance on behalf of the 6th respondent and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 5. 2. Petitioner is a dealer in diamonds based in Mumbai. According to the petitioner, under intimation to the assessing ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y has been revised to Rs.74,40,000/-. They were also called upon to furnish security of Rs.1,48,800/-. 4. Being the owner of the goods in question, petitioner represented against these proceedings as they were not made parties and admittedly in none of these proceedings petitioner was given any opportunity. Finally Ext.P28 notice has been issued to the 6th respondent under Section 47(8) of the KV ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t.P19, I do not think any prejudice will be caused to the interest of respondents 1 to 5. 6. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition with the following directions; (1) That the petitioner will deposit Rs.1,48,800/- (Rupees One lakh forty eight thousand and eight hundred only) demanded in Ext.P19 with the 4th respondent and on depositing the security as above, the consignment detained a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
