2013 (9) TMI 934

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Shri A.S. Rao with J.B. Mishra, for the Respondent. ORDER P.C. : Whether the CESTAT was justified in directing the appellant to make pre-deposit of Rs. 1.30 crores on the prima facie opinion that the credit availed on inputs used in construction of supporting structure which is embedded to the earth is not available to the assessee, is the question raised in this appeal. 2. The CESTAT has or .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ger Bench in the case of Vandana Properties has held that the amendment to Explanation (2) to Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 by notification dated 7th July, 2009 is retrospective in nature, the issue is debatable. In any event, dispute in the present case relates to the period prior to 7th July, 2009 and, therefore, in our opinion, it is a fit case to hear the matter on merits without .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X