TMI Blog2013 (9) TMI 969X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hort) impugns order dated 25.06.2010, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the case M/s. Lahsa Construction Pvt. Ltd. on the ground of perversity. The appeal pertains to the Assessment Year 1999-2000. (incorrectly mentioned in the impugned order as assessment year 2006-07). 2. Property in question bearing No.C-20, NDSE, South Ex., Part-II, New Delhi had two sellers. The respondent/asses ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t/assessee had disclosed sale consideration of as Rs.39,00,000/- for sale of their 50% share, in the property to Mrs. Madhu Arora. Mrs. Madhu Arora and Mr. Om Prakash Arora paid an amount of Rs.44,00,000/- to the four individual co-owners for purchase of the balance 50% share. Thus, in all they had shown sale consideration of Rs.83,00,000/-, instead of Rs.2,84,72,600/-, as opined by the Department ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|