9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (10) TMI 1149X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Learned A.R. was requested to find out whether the exporter covered by Anti-dumping notification is in appeal before Anti-dumping Bench - If their appeal is pending, it would not be proper to decide the appeals by Customs Bench hurriedly as that shall have serious repercussion on the economy - Anti-dumping duty being a trade measure remedy and affect the economy, safeguard measure is to be taken ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... isdiction of Anti-dumping Bench as export was made from China and the goods covered by Notification No. 39/2010-Cus dated 23.3.2010 as indicated in the table thereunder are liable to Anti-dumping duty. Custom notification was based on the finding of Designated Authority under F. No. 12/12/2008-DGFT dated 31.12.2009 (page 54 of paper book). Learned Counsel submitted that certain goods were beyond t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ty and interest. 3. Revenue supports the adjudication on the ground that when the goods imported was properly classifiable under Tariff Entry No. 8477 which was contemplated by Anti-dumping notification dated 23.3.2010, there should be no difference. 4. We are not in a hurry to take any view today on merit. We requested Shri Govind Dixit, learned A.R. to find out whether the exporter covered b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... No. 2047/2011 (in Customs appeal No. 310/2011), to deposit Rs. 40 lakhs (Rupees forty lakhs) within 8 weeks from today and make compliance on 29th July, 2013. We have taken into consideration the financial hardship pleaded before us and also considered the Revenues interest to direct so since Anti-dumping duty liability of Rs. 1,48,42,255/- has arisen in adjudication with consequential penalty as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
