9911796707
TMI Blog1997 (6) TMI 341X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , 1997 passed by the respondent-Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, under suo motu revisional power conferred under section 22A(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (in short, the Act ). 2.. The basic facts are not in dispute. The appellant is a registered dealer under the Act having its administrative office at Mission Road, Bangalore, and its factory is situated at Doddaballapur. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 79,580 plus duty of Rs. 12,728 issued by M/s. OEN Connectors Ltd; (iii) Packing slip No. 1835 dated September 12, 1992 of M/s. OEN Connectors Ltd., Mulanthuruthy via Cochin issued in favour of M/s. WSI Electronics Ltd., Bangalore, for having purchased 270 connectors (1 case); (iv) Central Excise gate pass No. 2949 dated September 12, 1992 for the value of connectors of Rs. 12,587 plus duty of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... inter alia, by holding that the genuineness of the transaction is not at all in dispute and nothing was brought on record to show that the assessee had any intention of evading the tax. 4.. Subsequent to the said order, the Additional Commissioner took upon himself to initiate suo motu proceedings under section 22A(1) of the Act and after notice to the assessee, set aside the appellate order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rted with a statutory form 39, therefore, there is technical violation of law. In our opinion, even if it is so, the levy of penalty cannot be sustained, because for levying penalty even under the taxing statutes, it is incumbent upon the department to prove a guilty intention on the part of the assessee or taxpayers in not complying with the statutory requirements. The aforesaid aspect has been w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
