9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (11) TMI 302X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the Respondent : Mr. J. B. Mishra ORDER PC:- The petitioner has challenged the notice dated 1 October 2013 issued by the Superintendent, Group X, Anti Evasion, Service TaxII, Mumbai (respondent No.2) under Section 87(b) of the Finance Act 1994. By the impugned notice dated 1 October 2013, the respondent No.2 has directed the petitioner bankers viz. Respondent Nos 5 to 8 banks not to allow ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... plication for availing of the benefit of the Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme ("Scheme"). Further, under that scheme the petitioner's liability would be to pay only 50% of the outstanding liability by 31 December 2013. It is submitted that the entire amount of Rs.31,96,971 is payable in respect of dues prior to 31 December 2012. Therefore, at this stage nothing is payable by t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the demand for Rs.1.22 crores is on the basis of the statement dated 25 September 2013 made by the petitioner's Director to the respondents. In the above statement while admitting the liability to Rs.1.22 crores the petitioner has also pointed out that they have cenvat credit of Rs.60.40 lacs available. The aforesaid amount has been fully utilized in partly discharging the dues as is evident from ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for settlement under the scheme being accepted, interest of justice would be served if the respondentrevenue are directed to vacate the attachment of the petitioner's bank accounts with respondent Nos.5 to 8 Banks on the petitioner depositing 50% of Rs.16 lacs. 6) At this stage learned Counsel for the respondent states that the petitioner is liable to pay service tax for the month of September 20 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
