9911796707
TMI Blog1996 (9) TMI 571X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion. The case of the assessee was that by virtue of G.O. Ms. No. 604, Revenue(S), dated April 9, 1981, when once exemption was granted in respect of the above turnovers under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (for short, "the APGST Act") the assessing officer had no power to hold that the dealer was not entitled to exemption under section 8(2-A) of the CST Act. The assessing officer was of the opinion that G.O. Ms. No. 604, Revenue(S), dated April 9, 1981 is not of a general nature but a conditional one and, therefore, although under the APGST Act the turnovers in question were eligible for exemption, the same advantage the assessee could not get under the CST Act. The first appellate authority affirmed that view. On appeal, th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... reby exempts from payment of tax under the said Act on the sales of all varieties of certified and truthfully labelled seeds for agricultural purposes in the course of inter-State trade or commerce with effect from the 15th February, 1989." 5.. The judgment of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal in Pinakini Seeds case [1988] 6 APSTJ 140 was reversed by a Division Bench of this Court in Pinakini Seeds v. State of Andhra Pradesh [1995] 98 STC 144. Interpreting G.O. Ms. No. 604, the Division Bench held: "As stated above, certified and truthfully labelled seeds are seeds which have been so classified under the Seeds Act . Therefore, the requirements of the G.O., are only indicative of the nature of the goods which are entitled to exemption ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ods shall not be deemed to be exempt from tax generally under the sales tax law of the appropriate State if under that law the sale or purchase of such goods is exempt only in specified circumstances or under specified conditions or the tax is levied on the sale or purchase of such goods at specified stages or otherwise than with reference to the turnover of the goods." 8. Section 9 of the APGST Act confers power on State Government to notify exemption and reduction of tax or interest. A Division Bench of this Court speaking through one of us (M.N. Rao, J.) in Vinod Solvent Extracts (P.) Ltd. v. State of Andhra Pradesh [1989] 73 STC 175 interpreting section 8(2-A) of the CST Act held: "..............if the turnover or any part of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... TC 144 (AP), as a binding precedent, in our considered opinion does not merit acceptance. The question that fell for consideration in Pine Chemicals Ltd. case [1992] 85 STC 432 (SC) which was subsequently reviewed and reversed in Pine Chemicals Ltd. case [1995] 96 STC 355 (SC) related to identification of the exempted goods qua the goods or the dealer. Such a controversy has not arisen for resolution in the present case before us. We are, therefore, not inclined to discuss the other aspects of the aforesaid Pine Chemicals Ltd. case [1992] 85 STC 432, decided by the Supreme Court. What is uncontroversial is that the disputed turnovers were exempted from the tax net under the APGST Act. As the Division Bench of this Court in Pinakini case [19 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
