9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (11) TMI 969X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r not - No reasons were assigned as to why the application of the petitioner has been rejected - Revenue is directed to reconsider the application made by the petitioner in the light of the various materials which have been placed by the petitioner and in accordance with law – The issue was restored. - WRIT PETITION NO.41308 OF 2013 (T-IT) - - - Dated:- 6-11-2013 - B V Nagarathna, J. For th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d 25.6.2013, the petitioner was requested to appear before the authority on 05-07-2013, a copy of which is produced at Annexure-F. The petitioner appeared on the said date and also filed Annexure-G which is the response to the communication dated 25.6.2013. Thereafter, the impugned order at Annexure-K has been passed. 3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion be issued to respondent no.1 to reconsider the application made by the petitioner in accordance with law. 5. However, the learned counsel for the respondents supported Annexure-K and stated that when there were outstanding dues from the petitioner and thus the application of the petitioner could not be considered favourably. 6. I have perused the communication at Annexure-K dated 8.8.2013 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
