Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1992 (4) TMI 236

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e, in C.T.A. No. 418 of 1988 dated April 3, 1990, has preferred this revision petition. Brief facts are the following: The assessment year is 1982-83. The respondent is a co-operative milk producers union. In the taxable turnover for the year in question, the respondent has not included sales of cattle feed, though the respondent has shown that turnover in the total turnover. At this stage, it mus .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eded before the Tribunal in getting the levy of penalty set aside. The Tribunal on facts has found as follows: In fact the exemptions were allowed originally for the assessment years 1979-80 to 1981-82 and the assessments were subsequently revised on June 2, 1983 and by that time the time for filing the consolidated return for the year 1982-83 was also over and therefore the appellants-societ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Act levied by the assessing authority for the year 198182 on similar set of facts in C.T.A. No. 273/84 and therefore the appellants would have bona fide believed that sale of cattle feed to the member-societies of the appellants was exempted from payment of sales tax and therefore the appellants would have shown the turnover as not taxable in the returns submitted by them. But because of the no .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ax and therefore we feel the levy of penalty by the assessing officer for non-reporting the turnover of cattle feed to the member-societies as taxable turnover is not correct.... It is the above view of the Tribunal that is challenged before us. 2.. In T.C.(R) No. 1008 of 1984 (State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Vellore v. Indian Silk Tradersorder .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ue to the Government, or under a bona fide belief that his return was in accordance with law. From the facts extracted above, we have no hesitation to come to the conclusion that the assessee bona fide believed that it was claiming exemption in accordance with law and therefore did not include the turnover of sales of Reported in [1994] 94 STC 157 (Mad.) [App.]. cattle feed. The Tribunal was th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates