9911796707
TMI Blogdemand sustainable or notX X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... demand sustainable or not X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on us by invoking sec. 73 (1) of the FA, 1994 (alleging fraud, etc) and ADC confirmed the demand as per the same section. In the appeal stage (comm Appeals), we had argued that sec. 73 (1) can not be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rightly invoked against us. The personal hearing at the Commissioner (A) was also completed. Now the ADC has issued a 'corrigendum to the OIO, stating that the demand is confirmed as per section 73(2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ). My query is that such an action by the ADC is sustainable at this stage? Also, what is the remedy available to us at this stage? Can any of the practicing members can cite some case laws to support ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... us? Reply By Pradeep Khatri: The Reply: Mentioning the wrong section does not absolve the demand of tax/duty which had been raised on alleging fraud, collusion etc.). If the Section 73(2) of the Fi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nance Act, 1994 was not mentioned in OIO then ADC can't issue a corrigendum to OIO and confirm the demand. You can challenge this adjudication order. Reply By dipsang vadhel: The Reply: Yes. I agre ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e with Mr. Pradip khatri. Mentioning wrong section in adjudication order which has no mention in SCN clearly shows that hearing has been done in predetermined manner. You can always chellege such or ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... der before apporiate authority. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
