TMI Blog1999 (3) TMI 620X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cheques were signed by A. Chinnaswami, Managing Director of Shakti Spinners Ltd. When the cheques were presented for payment, they were, dishonoured on the ground that 'sufficient funds were not available and exceed arrangement'. A notice was then sent by the appellant which the respondent refused to accept. This was followed by a complaint under Section 138 read with Section 142 of the Indian Neg ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... proceedings were initiated by the appellant against A. Chinnaswami who happened to be the Managing Director of Shakti Spinners Ltd. The cheques in question which were dishonoured were signed by him. The process was issued by the Judicial Magistrate in his name. We see no infirmity in the notice issued under Section 138 addressed to A. Chinnaswami, who was a signatory of the said cheques. The High ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|