9911796707
TMI Blog1990 (11) TMI 403X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ri LJ NOC 139) dismissing the appellant's writ petition challenging the order of his detention dated 13-2-1989 made under Section 3(1) and declaration dated 17-4-1989 made under Section 10(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988. The appellant contends that certain important documents relied upon by the detaining authority had not been suppli ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tement, had retracted from his statement. 5. On 3-3-1989 the appellant was, pursuant to order dated 13-2-89, arrested and detained. In the grounds of detention there is a specific reference to the appellant's application for bail which was rejected by the Judicial First Class Magistrate, and to the subsequent grant of bail by the Sessions Court. 6. Counsel for the appellant submits that refere ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... arely covered by that decision. In paragraph 27 of that judgment, this Court after the relevant decisions on the point stated; 27. Considering the facts in the instant case, the bail application and the bail order were vital materials for consideration. If those were not considered the satisfaction of the detaining authority itself would have been impaired, and if those had been considered, they ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... after unsuccessfully making two earlier attempts, again contended that certain documents which he had asked for were not given to him, and, therefore, there was failure of justice. Rejecting that contention, this Court stated that the documents he had asked for had no relevance to his detention and no injustice had been done to him by refusing to give him those documents on which no reliance what ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
