9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (1) TMI 425X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... h – Decided against Assessee. - Appeal No. 1626-1627 and 3681-3683 of 2012 - - - Dated:- 8-4-2013 - Ms. Archana Wadhwa and Shri Rakesh Kumar, JJ. For the Appellant: Ms. Vanisha Mittal, Advocate For the Respondent: Shri R.K. Mathur, Authorized Representative (DR) JUDGEMENT Per. Archana Wadhwa :- Vide stay order No. 55338-55342/2013 dated 9/01/2013, appellant was directed to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ch as the total duty involved in the present appeals is Rs. 1,06,45,853/- the appellants were directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 10,00,000/- with a bank guarantee of Rs. 10,00,000/-. On matter being called today for ascertaining compliance, learned advocate submits that a miscellaneous application stand filed by them for modification of the stay order. She submits that the appellant is going thr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mount of Rs. 10,00,000/- and to give bank guarantee of Rs. 10,00,000/- out of the total confirmed demand of more than Rs. 1,00,00,000/- cannot be held to be harsh. Moreover the said directions were made by adopting the criteria in the earlier order of the Hon ble High Court of Punjab Haryana and at the request of the advocate itself. As such, we find no merits in the miscellaneous application fi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
