9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (1) TMI 1148X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ong with the services provided in the balance sheet, the confusion has been created. In these circumstances, the offer made by the ld. Advocate to deposit Rs.33.00 lakh is accepted. The Department is at liberty to verify the payment particulars of Rs.17,62,909/-. Consequently, the Applicant are directed to make the predeposit of Rs.33.00 lakh in addition to Rs.17,62,909/- already deposited, within ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2. At the outset, ld. Advocate for the Applicant submitted that they have been rendering erection, commissioning or installation services during the period from 2004-05 to 2008-09 to their clients including M/s. Durgapur Steel Plant under DSP Project. 3. Ld. Advocate submitted that besides providing services under the Head: Erection, Commissioning or Installation Services, they had also supplie ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ,909.00 and reported the same to the Commissioner during the course of adjudication proceedings, and along with the present Appeal, they had enclosed the respective TR-6 Challans against which the payments were made by them, which could be verified by the Department. Ld. Advocate made a fair offer to make a further predeposit of Rs.33.00 lakh. 4. Ld. AR for the Revenue reiterated the findings of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
