Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2002 (8) TMI 823

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Rs. 3,10,000 and the item involved in O.P. No. 3687 of 2002 is described as table for the Department of Orthopaedics and Urology costing Rs. 2,50,000. The items were detained at sales tax check-post, Walayar while on transport to hospitals in Kerala. The petitioner contends that the items in both the cases do not constitute furniture in the ordinary sense of the term, but are medical equipments or hospital equipments used only for the purpose of surgery. The leaflet describing the item and its detailed description are contained in exhibit P3 produced along with original petition. The Olympus 2000 Mobile C-Arm Multi Procedures Table referred in O.P. No. 3780 of 2002 is power operated and remote controlled. Its essential features are the foll .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... c. 1 No." It is unnecessary to go into further details. 3.. The contention of the petitioner is that these are high value medical equipments which are used only by hospitals for the purpose of surgery. According to counsel, the essential purpose is not that of furniture, but that of the facilities provided thereto. It is held by the Allahabad High Court in Imperial Surgico Industries v. Commissioner, Sales Tax, Uttar Pradesh [1969] 23 STC 201 that the term furniture is not to be given any artificial or technical definition, but should be given a meaning which is known to the trader as well as the consumer dealing with the item. That was also a case where the Allahabad High Court held that hospital equipments cannot be classified as furn .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d for a match factory. The Madras High Court held that it is an item of furniture even though it is designed for the purpose of the factory. Of course the item involved in that case cannot be compared to that of a surgical table involved here with modern electronic accessories used in the assistance of surgery and treatment. It is a well-settled position in series of decisions of the Supreme Court and various High Courts that the entries in the Schedule to the Act have to be given their popular meaning, i.e., the meaning attached to the item by traders dealing in the goods and consumers using the same. No one can procure a surgical table from a furniture shop. Furniture means articles used in houses, offices, factories, etc., such as chair, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates