9911796707
TMI Blog2002 (10) TMI 758X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of soda effected in the bar attached hotel. 2.. The assessee is bar attached hotel. The assessment year concerned is 1992-93. In the return filed by the assessee for the year 1992-93 the assessee claimed that soda sold in the bar attached hotel falls squarely under entry 40 of the Fist Schedule to the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 as it stood at the relevant time taxable only at 6 per cent ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... refore it is unnecessary to go into the question as to whether soda is a "beverage" so as to bring it under entry 40 of the First Schedule. The Government Pleader also relied on the decision of this Court in V.M. Vilasini v. State of Kerala [2001] 123 STC 127; (2001) 9 KTR 411 specifically dealing with soda and cola and also the decision in T.R.C. No. 459 of 2001 where it was specifically held tha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as to whether soda sold in the bar hotel falls in those entries. He also submitted that the two decisions which are relied on by the department did not consider the question in that perspective. 5.. We have considered the rival submissions. Entries 40 and 87 of the First Schedule to the Act as they stood at the relevant time, read as follows: Reported in [2004] 138 STC 377 (Ker) (Casino Hotel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r hotels/restaurants. The contention of the assessee is that soda falls under beverages and since the same is old or served in the bar hotel it is taxable only at 6 per cent. It must be noted that entry 40 begins with the words cooked food including. In the above circumstances, according to us, beverages referred to in the said entry normally must be a product of the kitchen. It must be one made ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ention of the respondent that the soda dealt with by the assessee is taxable only under entry 40 of the First Schedule to the Act taxable at 6 per cent. Reported in [2004] 138 STC 377 (Ker) (Casino Hotel v. State of Kerala) [In view of the above, we reverse the order of the Tribunal and allow the revision.] Petition allowed. Corrected as per order CMP No. 1944 of 2003 in T.R.C. No. 99 of 199 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
